Legal Opinion
Rutti v. Lojack Corp., Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided March 2, 2010No. 07-56599PublishedCited by 61 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by Judge CALLAHAN;1 Separate Opinion by Judge SILVERMAN; Partial Concurrence and Partial Dissent by Judge HALL: Dissent by Judge CALLAHAN.
ORDER AND OPINION
ORDER
The petition for panel rehearing is granted in part and denied in part. The Opinion filed August 21, 2009, and appearing at 578 F.3d 1084 (9th Cir.2009), is withdrawn. It may not be cited as precedent by or to this court or any district court of the Ninth Circuit.
The superseding opinion will be filed concurrently with this order.
OPINION
CALLAHAN, Circuit Judge:
Mike Rutti sought to bring a class action on behalf of all…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Anderson v. Mt. Clemens Pottery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Armour & Co. v. WantockSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- IBP, Inc. v. AlvarezSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Balint v. Carson CityCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by61 opinions
- Kuebel v. Black & Decker Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2011
- Bamonte v. City of MesaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Troester v. Starbucks CorporationCalifornia Supreme Court · 2018
- Aguilar v. Management & TrainingCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2020
- Little v. Technical Specialty Products, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Texas · 2013
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.