Legal Opinion

Avery v. Weitz

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided November 8, 1979No. 183, September Term, 1979PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.

There are two questions to be resolved in this appeal from a judgment entered on a cognovit promissory note payable in thirty-six monthly installments:

1) Whether the applicable statute of limitations is a bar to the recovery of unpaid installments which accrued more than three years before the entry of the confessed judgment?

2) Whether the stated 10% per annum interest rate violates applicable usury laws?

The trial court determined the answer to both questions to be in the negative and allowed the confessed judgment to be enrolled in the full amount sought by the plaintiff. For the reasons…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Oklahoma Brick Corporation v. McCallSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1972
  2. Toomey v. CammackDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1975
  3. Santini v. FritkinCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1965
  4. Kleiman v. KolkerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1948
  5. Parsons v. LurieIllinois Supreme Court · 1948

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. The United States of America, on Behalf of Its Agency, the Small Business Administration v. Louis RichardsonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
  2. Clark v. TrumbleMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1998
  3. Cecil v. AAA Mid-Atlantic, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2000
  4. Ely v. Science Applications International Corp.District Court, D. Maryland · 2010
  5. Hess Construction v. Francis O'Day Co.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2025

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API