Legal Opinion

Santini v. Fritkin

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided December 30, 1965No. [No. 14, September Term, 1965.]PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHorney, J.

This appeal presents a question as to what effect the foreclosure of a chattel deed of trust given to secure the payment of a promissory note containing an optional acceleration clause had on the running of the statute of limitations in an action brought to recover the balance due on the note.

The cause of action arose out of the sale of a grocery business to Benjamin and Rose Fritkin (defendants-appellees) by Anthony Santini (plaintiff-appellant) and his wife in October of 1958. Since only a part of the consideration was paid in cash, the Fritkins executed their promissory note to the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Gerber v. KarrCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1963
  2. Kleiman v. KolkerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1948

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Jensen v. State Bank of AllisonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1975
  2. Waller v. Maryland National BankCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1993
  3. Block v. Ford Motor Credit CompanyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1972
  4. National Bank of Commerce Trust & Savings Ass'n v. HamNebraska Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Genn v. CIT Corp.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1978

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API