Legal Opinion

Oklahoma Brick Corporation v. McCall

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 9, 1972No. 44031PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McINERNEY, Justice:

On certiorari to the Court of Appeals, Division No. 2, we must decide when the statute of limitations begins to run on an installment note which contains an option to accelerate the due date of remaining installments upon default of any one installment.

On August 1, 1969, plaintiff, Oklahoma Brick Corporation, commenced this action to recover on a note, in the amount of $1,713.84, executed by defendant, Richard J. McCall. The note was payable in four equal installments of $425.96 each. The first installment was due on June 15, 1964, the second on July 1, 1964, the third on…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Core v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
  2. Big Four Foundry Co. v. HagensSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1946
  3. Union Central Life Ins. Co. v. AdamsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
  4. Turner v. Sooner Oil & Gas Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952
  5. Kelley v. Garfield County Bldg. & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Cochran v. CochranCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
  2. Dorothy Williams v. Borden, Inc., and Goodyear Tire and Rubber Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1981
  3. City of Norman v. LiddellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1979
  4. Sherwood Forest No. 2 Corp. v. City of NormanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
  5. Stephens v. General Motors Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API