Legal Opinion
Toomey v. Cammack
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided October 7, 1975No. 8841PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Per curiam
Appellee sued appellants to recover on three promissory notes executed in 1963. 1 Appellants in their answer admitted execution of the notes. On appellee’s motion the trial court entered summary judgment in his favor in the amount of $98,806.00 in total principal and interest. 2 Appellants assert in this court that the grant of summary judgment was improper in light of defenses which they had raised to the enforcement of the notes. We reverse the judgment.
Appellants’ first assertion is that the three year statute of limitations 3 bars most of appellee’s claim. The notes in question provided…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Namerdy v. GeneralcarDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1966
- Oklahoma Brick Corporation v. McCallSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1972
- Charlestown Five Cents Savings Bank v. WolfMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941
- United Securities Corporation v. BrutonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1965
- Noel v. BaskinDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1942
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Spellman v. American Security Bank, N.A.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1986
- Yasuna v. MillerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
- Keefe Co. v. Americable International, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2000
- Partnership Placements, Inc. v. Landmark InsuranceDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1998
- Pardue v. Center City Consortium Schools of the Archdiocese of Washington, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2005
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.