In re Curtis
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FELDMAN, Chief Justice.
David Curtis, Jr. (“Respondent”) appeals from the recommendation of the Arizona Supreme Court Disciplinary Commission (“Commission”) that he be suspended from the practice of law, be placed on probation thereafter, and pay restitution.
The Commission found that during the course of representing a client in a civil matter, Respondent lacked competence, lacked diligence, failed to maintain proper client communication, and failed to adequately protect his client’s interests upon termination of the representation. Specifically, the Commission found that Respondent…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Matter of WolframArizona Supreme Court · 1993
- In Re a Member of the State Bar of Arizona, MyersArizona Supreme Court · 1990
- In Re a Member of the State Bar of Arizona, MulhallArizona Supreme Court · 1989
- In Re VarbelArizona Supreme Court · 1995
3Cited by12 opinions
- In Re PeasleyArizona Supreme Court · 2004
- Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of the State of North Dakota v. McKechnieNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
- In the Matter of Rachel R. AlexanderArizona Supreme Court · 2013
- In Re WalkerArizona Supreme Court · 2001
- In Re Disciplinary Action Against McKechnieNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.