Legal Opinion

Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of the State of North Dakota v. McKechnie

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided February 19, 2003No. 20020194PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Per curiam

[¶ 1] Wilham E. McKechnie and Disciplinary Counsel have filed objections to a hearing panel’s report and order of discipline suspending McKechnie from the practice of law for 30 days and ordering he pay costs of the disciplinary proceedings for his violation of N.D.R. Prof. Conduct 1.1 and 1.4(b). We conclude there is clear and convincing evidence McKechnie violated N.D.R. Prof. Conduct 1.4(b), and we order that he be publicly reprimanded and pay the costs of the disciplinary proceedings in the amount of $5,375.59.

I

[¶ 2] McKechnie was admitted to practice law in North Dakota on October 5,…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Olson v. FraaseNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Stormon v. WeissNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Committee on Legal Ethics of West Virginia State Bar v. MullinsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1976
  4. State v. SaulNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Committee on Legal Ethics of the West Virginia State Bar v. ComettiWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1993

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. State v. ThompsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of the State of North Dakota v. FelandNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
  3. In Re Disciplinary Action Against GieseNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Nesvig v. NesvigNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
  5. In Re Disciplinary Action Against AskewNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API