Legal Opinion

In Re Walker

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided June 19, 2001No. SB-00-0096-D. Disc. Comm. No. 99-0406PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FELDMAN, Justice.

¶ 1 William J. Walker petitions for review of a recommendation from the Disciplinary Commission (Commission) that he be suspended from the practice of law for ninety days. Upon review, we find the Commission’s sanction too severe and instead adopt the hearing officer’s recommendation that Walker be censured. We have jurisdiction under Rule 53.e, Rules of the Supreme Court of Arizona (Rule), and Arizona Constitution, Article 6, Section 5.6.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

¶ 2 Walker is a fifty-one-year-old sole practitioner who focuses primarily on personal injury law. He…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Matter of LevineArizona Supreme Court · 1993
  2. In Re a Member of the State BarArizona Supreme Court · 1998
  3. In re CurtisArizona Supreme Court · 1995
  4. In Re a Suspended Member of the State Bar of Arizona, BradyArizona Supreme Court · 1996

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. In Re PeasleyArizona Supreme Court · 2004
  2. In Re AlcornArizona Supreme Court · 2002
  3. In Re Non-Member of State Bar, Van DoxArizona Supreme Court · 2007
  4. In Re MoakArizona Supreme Court · 2003
  5. In re a Member of the State BarArizona Supreme Court · 2009

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API