Legal Opinion
Matter of Wolfram
Arizona Supreme Court
Decided February 11, 1993No. SB-91-0040-D. Disc. Comm. Nos. 86-1532, 87-0008 and 87-0227PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FELDMAN, Chief Justice.
Donald E. Wolfram (“Respondent”) appeals from the recommendation of the Arizona Supreme Court Disciplinary Commission (“Commission”) that he be suspended from the practice of law for a period of eighteen months and pay restitution in the amount of $3,650.
The Commission found that during the course of representing a client in a criminal matter, Respondent lacked competence, lacked diligence, and failed to maintain proper client communication. Specifically, the Commission found that Respondent violated Ethical Rule (“ER”) 1.1 (competence), ER 1.3 (diligence), and…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- State v. SmithArizona Supreme Court · 1984
- State v. DippreArizona Supreme Court · 1979
- Matter of PetrieArizona Supreme Court · 1987
- State v. StanleyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1979
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- In Re PeasleyArizona Supreme Court · 2004
- In Re a Member of the State Bar of Arizona, FioramontiArizona Supreme Court · 1993
- In the Matter of Rachel R. AlexanderArizona Supreme Court · 2013
- In Re SchollArizona Supreme Court · 2001
- Matter of HorwitzArizona Supreme Court · 1994
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.