Magar v. City of Portland
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtWollheim, J.
Plaintiff appeals from a judgment dismissing his petition for writ of review for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We review the circuit court’s legal conclusion regarding jurisdiction for errors of law, Horn and Horn, 97 Or App 177, 180, 775 P2d 338, rev den 308 Or 465 (1989), and conclude that the failure to file an undertaking in a writ of review proceeding is not a jurisdictional defect. Accordingly, we vacate the circuit court’s judgment of dismissal and remand to the circuit court.
Plaintiff is the owner of a residential property located in the City of Portland. At some point before…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Scovill v. City of AstoriaOregon Supreme Court · 1996
- Dippold v. Cathlamet Timber Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1920
- Kaiser Foundation Health Plan of the Northwest v. DoeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
- Kaiser Foundation Health Plan v. DoeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
- In re the Marriage of HornCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Parker v. City of AlbanyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
- Dodds v. City of West LinnCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
- Hill v. City of PortlandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2019
- Kleikamp v. Board of Commissioners of Yamhill CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2019
- Spivak v. MarriottCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.