Legal Opinion
Hill v. City of Portland
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided March 6, 2019No. A164569PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAoyagi, J.
*471Plaintiff utilized the City of Portland's Early Assistance program to obtain advice regarding likely requirements for a possible development. Displeased with the response, plaintiff pursued the matter further with the city, culminating in the Public Works Appeals Board denying plaintiff's appeal. Plaintiff then petitioned for a writ of review in the circuit court. The circuit court dismissed the petition and quashed the writ for lack of jurisdiction. Plaintiff appeals. For the reasons that follow, we affirm.
The relevant facts are undisputed. In 2014, plaintiff purchased real property on NE…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Nollan v. California Coastal CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Dolan v. City of TigardSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Strawberry Hill 4 Wheelers v. Board of CommissionersOregon Supreme Court · 1979
- Coast Range Conifers, LLC v. State Ex Rel. Oregon State Board of ForestryOregon Supreme Court · 2005
- US West Communications, Inc. v. City of EugeneOregon Supreme Court · 2003
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Moon v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1970
- Board of Cty. Comm. of Columbia Cty. v. RosenblumCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2023
- Rudder v. HosackCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2022