Legal Opinion
In re the Marriage of Horn
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided June 14, 1989No. D8409-66975; CA A48375PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGraber, P. J.
1,2. Husband, a resident of California, appeals from the denial of his motion to set aside a default judgment in this dissolution proceeding.1 ORCP 71B(l)(d). He contends that the trial court lacked jurisdiction to adjudicate any personal claims against him.2 We agree and modify the judgment accordingly.
The parties married in 1969. Two children, now ages 11 and 13, were born of the marriage. Husband is a special agent for the federal Drug Enforcement Administration. The family lived in Oregon before husband was transferred to California in 1981. When they relocated to California, they left…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Kulko v. Superior Court of Cal., City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- State Ex Rel. Jones v. CrookhamOregon Supreme Court · 1984
- Hackett v. Alco Standard Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- McCaffery v. GreenAlaska Supreme Court · 1997
- Sutherland v. BrennanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
- Boehm & Co. v. Environmental Concepts, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
- O'Neil v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
- Magar v. City of PortlandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.