Spivak v. Marriott
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtBrewer, C. J.
James and Gary Spivak, personal representatives of the estate of Henry Spivak, dba Mr. Car Wash, appeal from a judgment that dismissed plaintiffs 1 petition for a writ of review and his constitutional, conversion, and contract claims against defendants City of Portland Bureau of Environmental Services (the city) and Dean C. Marriott, the Bureau’s director. We reverse and remand.
The trial court granted defendants’ motion under ORCP 21A to dismiss plaintiffs petition for a writ of review and thereafter granted defendants’ motion for summary judgment on the remaining claims. We therefore accept…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- State v. WyattOregon Supreme Court · 2000
- State v. AmayaOregon Supreme Court · 2004
- Granewich v. HardingOregon Supreme Court · 1999
- Strawberry Hill 4 Wheelers v. Board of CommissionersOregon Supreme Court · 1979
- Shockey v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1992
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Butchart v. Baker CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007
- Kleikamp v. Board of Commissioners of Yamhill CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2019
- Wilsonville Subaru v. City of WilsonvilleCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2021