Legal Opinion

Kaiser Foundation Health Plan v. Doe

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided January 3, 1996No. 9309-05955; CA A85958PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, J.

In a motion entitled “motion for reconsideration,” pursuant to ORAP 6.25, defendant moves to dismiss this action for a declaratory judgment on the basis that the trial court and this court lack jurisdiction. Plaintiff also moves for reconsideration seeking clarification of language in our prior opinion. 136 Or App 566, 903 P2d 375 (1995). We allow reconsideration, modify our earlier opinion and remand the case to the trial court for further proceedings.

We first consider plaintiffs motion. Plaintiff asks us to change the language of our opinion, which at present provides:

“In summary, defendant…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Dippold v. Cathlamet Timber Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Stanley v. MuellerOregon Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Kaiser Foundation Health Plan of the Northwest v. DoeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
  4. Wright v. Hazen Investments, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Marx v. LenskeOregon Supreme Court · 1972

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Slover v. Oregon State Board of Clinical Social WorkersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
  2. Iron Horse Engineering Co. v. Northwest Rubber Extruders, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
  3. Wieck v. HostetterCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
  4. Hughes v. MisarCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
  5. Magar v. City of PortlandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API