Legal Opinion

Parker v. City of Albany

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided September 27, 2006No. 0410344; A127362PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RICHARDSON, S. J.

In this writ of review proceeding, petitioners challenge the City of Albany’s inclusion of their property within the boundaries of a local improvement district. The circuit court granted respondent’s ORCP 21 motion and entered a judgment of dismissal for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We review the circuit court’s conclusion regarding jurisdiction for errors of law, Magar v. City of Portland, 179 Or App 104, 106, 39 P3d 234 (2003), and we affirm.

In 2003, the city initiated the formation of a local improvement district (LID) to partially finance a project to extend North…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Magar v. City of PortlandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
  2. McKenney v. City of Lake OswegoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977
  3. School District No. 3J v. City of WilsonvilleCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Wallace v. STATE EX REL. PERBCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
  2. Parker v. City of AlbanyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
  3. Wallace v. State ex rel. Public Employees Retirement Board & Public Employees Retirement SystemCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
  4. Parker v. City of AlbanyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
  5. Atwood v. Dept. of TransportationCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2026

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API