Legal Opinion

State v. Parmenter

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided December 31, 2002No. 2001-573PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrock, C.J.

The defendant, Lucinda R. Parmenter, was convicted after a bench trial in New London District Court (McSwiney, J.) of driving while intoxicated (DWI), first offense, see RSA 265:82 (Supp. 2002). She appeals, arguing: (1) that the evidence presented at trial was insufficient to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that she was under the influence of intoxicating liquor; and (2) that the trial court exceeded its authority when it required her to attend eight self-help meetings. We affirm the conviction, but vacate the sentence and remand.

A reasonable trier of fact could have found the following…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. TaylorSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1989
  2. State v. CormierSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1985
  3. State v. HammellSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2001
  4. State v. NutterSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1991
  5. State v. SlizSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1983

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. TowleSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2015
  2. State v. WigginSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2004
  3. State v. BoulaisSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2003
  4. State v. LortonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2003
  5. In Re MooneySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2010

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API