Legal Opinion

State v. Taylor

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided November 13, 1989No. 88-184PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, J.

The defendant was convicted of driving while under the influence of intoxicating liquor, subsequent offense, after a two-day jury trial. RSA 265:82, 1(a) (Supp. 1988). On appeal he argues that the Trial Court’s (Dickson, J.) instruction to the jury that his blood alcohol level of .13 percent was prima facie evidence that he was driving under the influence of intoxicating liquor was in error. The defendant contends that since his blood alcohol content was tested approximately one hour and fifteen minutes after he was arrested, the test results do not accurately reflect his blood alcohol…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. GallantSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1967
  2. Kalloch v. Board of TrusteesSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1976
  3. State v. SlaterSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1969
  4. Hall v. BrusseauSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1956
  5. State v. SweeneySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1939

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Poulnot v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
  2. State v. KubikNebraska Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Appeal of RichardsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1991
  4. Dannie Carl Pattison v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2016
  5. Commonwealth v. ColturiMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2007

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API