Legal Opinion
State v. Boulais
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided November 7, 2003No. 2002-710PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDuggan, J.
The defendant, Christopher Boulais, appeals his conviction in Salem District Court {Jones, J.) on six counts of disorderly conduct. See RSA 644:2, 11(b) (1996). On appeal, Boulais argues that the trial court misconstrued RSA 644:2, 11(b) and that the evidence was insufficient to support his convictions. We reverse.
The record supports the following facts. In 2001, while employed at Sunsational Tanning Salon in Salem, Boulais made numerous remarks to female customers and employees which were the basis for six disorderly conduct charges.
The first two charges involved a woman who worked at the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Chaplinsky v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Commonwealth v. HockSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
- Matter of Welfare of S. L. J.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
- State v. ChaplinskySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1941
- Pennelli v. Town of PelhamSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2002
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Kelton v. Hollis Ranch, LLCSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2007
- State v. BrownSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2007
- In re Juvenile 2003-187Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2004
- State v. KelleySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2006
- Byrnes v. City of ManchesterDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2012
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.