Legal Opinion

State v. Sliz

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided December 29, 1983No. 83-122PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

The defendant, Raellen Sliz, appeals her conviction by a jury in Hillsborough County Superior Court (Flynn, J.) of driving while under the influence of intoxicating liquor, second offense. RSA 265:82, 1(a) (Supp. 1983). The question presented is whether the evidence introduced at trial was sufficient to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant was intoxicated. We affirm.

The arresting officer testified that on March 14,1982, he observed the defendant’s car swerving sharply from side to side on the Everett Turnpike. After stopping the defendant driver and approaching the car on foot,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. ArsenaultSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1975
  2. State v. CyrSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1982
  3. State v. BerrySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1977
  4. State v. CobbSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1983
  5. State v. HoppsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1983

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. LaRoseSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1985
  2. State v. PortigueSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1984
  3. State v. LakeSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1984
  4. Breest v. PerrinSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1984
  5. State v. MartinSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1984

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API