Legal Opinion
Blassingame v. Southern Asbestos Co.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Decided March 6, 1940PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtClarkson, J.
We do not think that the exception and assignment of error made by defendants to the judgment, as signed by the court below, can be sustained. Asbestosis cases have been before this Court heretofore. McNeeley v. Asbestos Co., 206 N. C., 568 (1934); Swink v. Asbestos Co., 210 N. C., 303. These cases were prior to the amendment of 1935.
*231Tbe General Assembly of North Carolina, at its regular session of 1935, passed a comprehensive act (chapter 123) in reference to occupational diseases, amending the "Workmen’s Compensation Act, Public Laws 1929, chapter 120, “And to provide for securing the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Johnson v. Asheville Hosiery Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
- State v. . HumphriesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
- McNeely v. Carolina Asbestos Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
- Lassiter v. Carolina Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Dalton v. Dow Chemical Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1968
- Blalock v. ROBERTS COMPANYCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971
- Roschak Et Ux. v. Vulcan Iron WorksSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
- Duncan v. City of CharlotteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
- Consolidation Coal Co. v. PorterCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1949
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.