Lassiter v. Carolina Telephone & Telegraph Co.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtClaRksoN, J.
Tbe question involved: Is tbe finding of tbe Industrial Commission to tbe effect that tbe fatal injuries received by tbe employee, tbe husband of plaintiff, did not “arise out of and in tbe course of bis employment” supported by competent evidence? We think so.
In Hunt v. State, 201 N. C., 707 (710-11), it is written: “So, 'while there is a difference between tbe beginning of employment and tbe beginning of work, or going to work on the employer’s time, an accident to a workman on bis way to work is not ordinarily in tbe course of employment.’ I Ilonnold on Workmen’s Compensation, sec. 107.…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Hunt v. . StateSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
- Dependents of Phifer v. Foremost Dairy, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
- Davis v. . Mecklenburg CountySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
3Cited by35 opinions
- Burgess Ex Rel. Burgess v. GibbsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
- Rewis v. . Insurance Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
- Bryan v. T. A. Loving Co. & AssociatesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
- Hardy v. SmallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
- Stanley v. . Hyman-Michaels Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.