Legal Opinion

Holly Hill Lumber Company, Inc. v. McCoy

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided June 14, 1943No. 15550PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Associate Justice Baker

delivered the unanimous opinion of the Court:

In an action for specific performance brought by the respondent against the appellant, this Court has already affirmed an order of the C:rcuit Court requiring the appellant to specifically perform a contract for the sale by him to the respondent of a certain tract of land. See Holly Hill Lumber Company v. McCoy, 201 S. C., 427, 23 S. E. (2d), 372, 380. The wife of the appellant was not a signatory party to the instrument (originally in the form of an option) that gave rise to the appellant’s contractual obligation to…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Holly Hill Lumber Co., Inc. v. McCoySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1942
  2. Brown v. BrownSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1913
  3. Ladshaw v. DrakeSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1937
  4. Wannamaker v. BrownSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1907
  5. Payne v. MeltonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1904

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Bramlett v. YoungSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1956
  2. Butler v. SchilletterSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1957
  3. Holly Hill Lumber Co., Inc. v. McCoySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1944
  4. Parker Peanut Co. v. FelderSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1945
  5. Moore v. MaesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1949

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API