Legal Opinion
Ladshaw v. Drake
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Decided May 31, 1937No. 14489PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
Mr. Justice Eishburne.
It appears from the record that the late A. J. Matheson devised unto his son, A. D. Matheson, a large plantation located in the County of Marlboro, known as “Louden,” and also a valuable residence situate in the Town of Bennettsville. The devise of the plantation to A. D. Matheson was made subject to his assuming and carrying out a contract which the testator had made with the Board of Missions of the Presbyterian Church in the United States, wherein he agreed to pay this board the sum of $1,200.00 yearly for a period of twenty…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Gordon, Rankin & Co. v. TweedySupreme Court of Alabama · 1883
- American Blower Co. v. MacKenzieSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929
- Shell v. DuncanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1889
- McCreery v. DavisSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1895
- Strayer v. LongSupreme Court of Virginia · 1890
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Holly Hill Lumber Company, Inc. v. McCoySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1943
- Holly Hill Lumber Co., Inc. v. McCoySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1944
- Mississippi State Highway Commission v. HemphillMississippi Supreme Court · 1965
- Shelton v. SheltonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1954
- United States v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1955
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.