Legal Opinion
Moore v. Maes
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Decided March 3, 1949No. 16188PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FishburnE, Justice.
The complaint in this case seeks specific performance of an option for the purchase of two lots located at the Northwest Corner of Carolina and Reynolds Avenues, Navy Yard, South Carolina, together with the buildings thereon, which property is described as follows:
“All that certain lot, piece, or parcel of land situate, lying and being in Chicora Place, in the County of Charleston, and State of South Carolina, being known, numbered, and designated on the plat of Chicora Place, recorded in Plat Book D, Page 197, in the R. M. C. Office of Charleston County, as Lots One (1)…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Kares v. CovellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1902
- First-Citizens Bank & Trust Co. v. FrazelleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
- Holly Hill Lumber Co., Inc. v. McCoySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1942
- Schaeffer v. BilgerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1946
- Bryant Timber Co. v. WilsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1909
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Sisco v. RotenbergSupreme Court of Florida · 1958
- Pitman v. SanditenTexas Supreme Court · 1981
- Shupe v. HamNevada Supreme Court · 1982
- White v. FELKELSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1952
- Banks Auto Parts, Inc. v. Banks Investments I, LC (In Re Banks Auto Parts, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia · 2008
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.