Legal Opinion

Brown v. Brown

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided May 27, 1913No. 8554PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Before Spain, J., Chesterfield, March, 1912. Action by J. IT. Brown and Nancy Brown against Jesse C. Brown and A. M. McNair. Plaintiffs appeal. 4 Rich. Eq. 140; 31 S. C. 566; 44 S. C. 226; 69 S. C. 373; 77 S. C. 65; 88 S. C. 292; 13 Am. R. 523; 24 Am. R. 740; 4 R. R. A. 119; 5 N. J. L. 824; 30 Ency. 240; 1 Pom. Eq. Jur., sec. 423; 166 U. S. 226; 195 U. S. 298; 167 U. S. 416.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice PIydrick.

This is an appeal from an order, refusing to enjoin the defendants from committing waste, on the ground that the wife of a grantor, is not entitled to the equitable aid of the Court, in the protection of a mere inchoate right of dower.

In substance the complaint alleges: That the plaintiffs were lawfully married; that during* coverture, the plaintiff, J. H. Brown, conveyed the land described in the complaint to Jesse C. Brown; that the plaintiff, Nancy A. Brown, has never relinquished her dower in said lands; that Jesse C. Brown has…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Gordon, Rankin & Co. v. TweedySupreme Court of Alabama · 1883
  2. Jackson v. EdwardsNew York Court of Chancery · 1839

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Holly Hill Lumber Company, Inc. v. McCoySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1943
  2. Tatum v. TatumSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1927
  3. In re MunfordDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1919
  4. Holly Hill Lumber Co., Inc. v. McCoySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1944
  5. Ladshaw v. DrakeSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1937

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API