Wannamaker v. Brown
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Action by E. J. Wannamaker against Samuel N. Brown. The following is the Circuit decree, omitting the formal judgment: “The above entitled action for the specific performance of a contract for the sale of real property, with the reservation of a portion of the purchase money, as indemnity against an outstanding incumbrance of an inchoate right of dower, came on to be heard before me, on the pleadings and testimony taken and reported by the master.
Read the full summary
Action by E. J. Wannamaker against Samuel N. Brown. The following is the Circuit decree, omitting the formal judgment: “The above entitled action for the specific performance of a contract for the sale of real property, with the reservation of a portion of the purchase money, as indemnity against an outstanding incumbrance of an inchoate right of dower, came on to be heard before me, on the pleadings and testimony taken and reported by the master. “From this testimony, I find as a matter of fact: That on August 31, 1905, the defendant, being the owner of a certain lot of land, described in…
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
Mr. Chief Justice Pope.
The facts of this case are set out in the decree of his Honor, the Circuit Judge, which is affirmed for the reasons therein stated.
Appeal dismissed.
Mr. Justicr Woods did not sit in this case becaiise disqualiñed.
2Cited by4 opinions
- Fisher v. MillerSupreme Court of Florida · 1926
- Holly Hill Lumber Company, Inc. v. McCoySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1943
- Holly Hill Lumber Co., Inc. v. McCoySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1944
- Rosenow v. MillerMontana Supreme Court · 1922