Legal Opinion

Robertson v. Dodson

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 2, 1942No. Civ. 12069PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WAGLER, J. pro tem.

This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of the plaintiff in an action to recover the sum of $500, paid as a deposit under a written contract to purchase certain real property owned by defendant.

The contract in question was executed on October 5, 1936; it acknowledged the receipt of the sum of $500 on account of an agreed purchase price of $8,000. Other provisions of the purchase agreement pertinent to this appeal read as follows:

“The balance of the purchase price is to be paid within ten (10) days from date hereof, as follows, to-wit: On completion of financing and…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Thompson v. RiggsSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
  2. Brown v. FerdonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Chapman v. JocelynCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  4. Hanley v. Marsh & McLennan-J. B. F. Davis & Son, Ltd.California Court of Appeal · 1941
  5. Doe v. VallejoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State of California v. DayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
  2. McConnell v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Big Bear Properties, Inc. v. GhermanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
  4. Roberts Distributing Co. v. Kaye-Halbert Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1954
  5. McConnell v. MERRILL LYNCH, PIERCE, FENNER & SMITHCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API