Legal Opinion
Hanley v. Marsh & McLennan-J. B. F. Davis & Son, Ltd.
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 22, 1941No. Civ. 11498PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPeters, P. J.
Plaintiff appeals from a judgment of nonsuit. Plaintiff and defendants are insurance brokers operating in the San Francisco area. The present action was brought to recover brokers’ commissions on certain fire insurance policies on the public school properties of San Francisco. The commissions on such policies, with the exception of $815, were paid to defendants. Plaintiff contends that he, rather than defendants, was entitled to these commissions. The trial court ruled that he had established no legal or equitable basis upon which he was entitled to the commissions, and granted defendants’…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Hermann v. Niagara Fire InsururanceNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
- Esberg v. BadaraccoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- Mitchell Camera Corp. v. Fox Film Corp.California Supreme Court · 1937
- Clinchy v. Grandview Dairy, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1940
- Stevenson v. Sun Insurance OfficeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1911
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Eddy v. SharpCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
- Mitton v. Granite State Fire Ins. Co. Granite State Fire Ins. Co. v. MittonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1952
- Walker v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
- Santandrea v. Siltec Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1976
- Robertson v. DodsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.