Doe v. Vallejo
California Supreme Court
Appeal from the District Court, Third Judicial District, Alameda County. The Court below in giving judgment did not allow plaintiffs interest on the instalments of interest which were not paid when they fell due. The plaintiffs appealed from the judgment and from an order denying a new trial. The other facts are stated in the opinion of the Court.
1Opinion of the Court
By the Court, Sawyer, J.
This is an action to foreclose a mortgage upon a tract of land constituting a part of “ Rancho del Alameda.” The lands are described in the mortgage as commencing “ at a point on the Alameda Creek, and about three hundred yards above the site of the old Vallejo mill, where a wire fence meets said creek; thence down said creek, following the meandering thereof, to a point where another wire fence meets said creek, and about three quarters of a mile from the starting point,” etc., and ends, “ embracing within said boundaries the grist mill, mill race and water…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Duff v. FisherCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
- Montgomery v. TuttCalifornia Supreme Court · 1858
- Talliaferro's Executors v. King's Administrator & HeirsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1840
- Cooley v. RoseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1807
- People v. BatchelderCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- State of California v. DayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
- Big Bear Properties, Inc. v. GhermanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
- Morrow v. MatthewIdaho Supreme Court · 1904
- Stuart v. HauserIdaho Supreme Court · 1903
- Finger v. McCaugheyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.