Legal Opinion
State of California v. Day
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 18, 1946No. Civ. 12975PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWard, J.
This action was instituted against C. B. Day and Carroll S. Bucher for alleged misapplication of money of the State Compensation Insurance Fund, (hereinafter referred to as the fund), and Massachusetts Bonding and Insurance Company, a corporation, as surety on a bond which is conditioned upon any designated act of wrongful abstraction, or willful misapplication, etc. of the funds of the fund. A second cause of action is based upon an alleged conspiracy founded upon the facts alleged in the first cause of action. Judgment was entered for the plaintiffs.
Defendant Day and the bonding company…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Bigelow v. RKO Radio Pictures, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Speegle v. Board of Fire UnderwritersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- See v. North American Accident InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
- People v. KauffmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- Hamilton v. Pacific Electric Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1939
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Harm v. FrasherCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- Salton Bay Marina, Inc. v. Imperial Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
- Auer v. FrankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
- Davy v. Public National InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- United States v. FotopulosCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1950
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.