Legal Opinion
DiNapoli v. Cooke
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided October 1, 1996No. 14290PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFoti, J.
The defendants1 appeal from the judgment
of the trial court rendered in favor of the plaintiffs2 on their complaint and on the defendants’ counterclaim. The plaintiffs’ complaint alleges that the defendants tortiously interfered with their sale of the land to the state of Connecticut. The defendants’ counterclaim alleges that the plaintiffs breached a contract with the defendants with respect to a portion of the subject land and that the plaintiffs violated the Connecticut Unfair Trade Practices Act (CUTPA), General Statutes § 42-110a et seq.3 The defendants assert that the trial court (1)…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Berry v. LoiseauSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- Larsen Chelsey Realty Co. v. LarsenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- Gargano v. HeymanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Goldman v. FeinbergSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1944
- Skrzypiec v. NoonanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Hi-Ho Tower, Inc. v. Com-Tronics, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
- Beverly Hills Concepts, Inc. v. Schatz & Schatz, Ribicoff & KotkinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- State v. VelascoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
- Sicaras v. City of HartfordConnecticut Appellate Court · 1997
- Soto v. Bushmaster Firearms International, LLCSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2019
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.