Legal Opinion
Goldman v. Feinberg
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided April 6, 1944PublishedCited by 57 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtInglis, J.
This is an action to recover damages for wrongfully depriving the plaintiff of a broker’s commission. The facts may be summarized as follows: Early in 1940 the named defendant, hereinafter referred to as the defendant, requested the plaintiff, who was a real estate broker in New Haven, to show him some houses which were for sale. During the next seven months the plaintiff attempted to interest the defendant in various properties but to no avail. Finally, in early August, the plaintiff saw a list of properties which had been distributed to the public by the New Haven Savings Bank. This was a…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Union Car Advertising Co. v. CollierNew York Court of Appeals · 1934
- Ball v. T. J. Pardy Construction Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1928
- Skene v. CarayanisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1926
- Lewis v. BloedeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1912
- Murphy v. LinskeySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1920
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by57 opinions
- Appleton v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
- Larsen Chelsey Realty Co. v. LarsenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- Blake v. LevySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- Hi-Ho Tower, Inc. v. Com-Tronics, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
- Beverly Hills Concepts, Inc. v. Schatz & Schatz, Ribicoff & KotkinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.