Beverly Hills Concepts, Inc. v. Schatz & Schatz, Ribicoff & Kotkin
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the Court
*50 Opinion
KATZ, J.
The principal issue in this appeal is the proper method for calculating damages for the destruction of a nascent business. We conclude that: (1) unestablished enterprises must be permitted to recover damages for legal malpractice and that a flexible approach in determining those damages generally is appropriate; (2) lost profits for a reasonable period of time may serve as an appropriate measure of damages under certain circumstances; and (3) the plaintiff bears the burden of proving lost profits to a reasonable certainty. As applied to the facts of this case, however, we…
2Cases cited49 opinions
- Pandolphe's Auto Parts, Inc. v. Town of ManchesterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- D'Ulisse-Cupo v. Board of Directors of Notre Dame High SchoolSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- White v. Southwestern Bell Tel. Co., Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1983
- Hinchliffe v. American Motors Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
- Kenford Co. v. County of ErieNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by128 opinions
- Hi-Ho Tower, Inc. v. Com-Tronics, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
- Daley v. Aetna Life & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
- Kids' Universe v. In2labsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
- Giulietti v. GiuliettiConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- Condon Auto Sales & Service, Inc. v. CrickSupreme Court of Iowa · 2000
123 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.