Legal Opinion

Reese v. Gross

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 22, 1934No. Civ. 1516PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMarks, J.

In June, 1928, plaintiff filed his action against defendants to quiet title to mining claims. The complaint is in the form usually found in such actions and, among other things, alleges “That the defendants, and each of them, claim some interest in and to said property adverse to this plaintiff.” The answer, filed in April, 1929, consisted solely of the following denial: “Deny each and every allegation as therein set forth.” This is in effect a disclaimer of any interest in the property. (Baar v. Smith, 201 Cal. 87 [255 Pac. 827].)

In October, 1931, the plaintiff moved the trial court for…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Baar v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Smart v. PeekCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Neale v. MorrowCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Warden v. StollCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Cohn v. KleinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. South Shore Land Co. v. PetersenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  2. Marshall v. SUPERIOR COURT, MARICOPA CTY.Arizona Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Coons v. ThompsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API