Marshall v. SUPERIOR COURT, MARICOPA CTY.
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
FELDMAN, Justice.
The question in this special action proceeding is whether an amendment to the complaint relates back to the date on which the action was filed. If not, the cause of action asserted in the amendment would be barred by the statute of limitations.
Acting through her conservator, plaintiff (the petitioner in this proceeding) brought an action against Britt, Eldridge and others. Eldridge is the only real party in interest in the special action before us. The complaint, filed in March 1977, alleged that plaintiff was a protected person (as defined in A.R.S. § 14-5101(2), that she…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Arizona Title Insurance & Trust Co. v. O'Malley Lumber Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1971
- Baar v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- Nataros v. Superior Court of Maricopa CountyArizona Supreme Court · 1976
- Smith v. PinnerArizona Supreme Court · 1948
- Kunselman v. Southern Pacific RailroadArizona Supreme Court · 1928
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Owen v. SUPERIOR COURT OF STATE OF ARIZ.Arizona Supreme Court · 1982
- Huskie v. Ames Bros. Motor & Supply Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1984
- Services Holding Co. v. Transamerica Occidental Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1994
- Quiles v. Heflin Steel Supply Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1985
- Romley v. DaughtonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2010
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.