Legal Opinion

Baar v. Smith

California Supreme Court

Decided April 20, 1927No. Docket No. S.F. 12316PublishedCited by 66 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPreston, J.

This is an application by the appellants Evelyn Ellis Smith, F. M. Smith, and West End Consolidated Mining Company, a corporation, for a supersedeas to restrain the enforcement of the judgment in fa.vor of the respondent, L. Baar, by an execution thereon pending their appeal therefrom. This relief is sought upon the ground that so much of said judgment as forms the basis for said execution is coram non judice and void and also that their duly perfected appeal ipso facto stays the enforcement of the judgment in the respect in which it is about to be enforced without the giving by them of any…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Windsor v. McVeighSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  2. Ex Parte ReedSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  3. Schwarz v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  4. McDougald v. HuletCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  5. Zappettini v. BucklesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by66 opinions

  1. Bandini Petroleum Co. v. Superior Court, Los Angeles Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Kirk v. CulleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Miller v. PetersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Estate of PieperCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  5. Callnon v. CallnonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935

61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API