College Point Savings Bank v. Tomlinson
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtTheodore Velsor, J.
This is a motion to confirm a report of the Beferee in surplus money proceedings. The sole contenders for the fund which amounts to $3,869.10, are the husband and wife who formerly owned the property as tenants by the entirety. The Beferee directed that the surplus, remaining after the expenses of the proceeding were deducted, be paid equally to the husband and wife, and that the amount of a New York State tax lien be paid from the husband’s share. It now appears that the tax lien has been satisfied so that the Beferee’s report to that extent must be satisfied as requested by the husband.
The…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Hiles v. . FisherNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
- Stretz v. ZolkoskiNew York Supreme Court · 1922
- East River Savings Bank v. KindNew York Supreme Court · 1960
- Germania Savings Bank v. JungNew York Supreme Court · 1892
3Cited by7 opinions
- Teitelbaum v. Parameswaran (In Re Parameswaran)District Court, S.D. New York · 1985
- Klavans v. KlavansCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1975
- Mojeski v. SiegmannNew York Supreme Court · 1976
- Doyle v. HammNew York Supreme Court · 1975
- Community Bank, National Assoc. v. Lyons (In Re Lyons)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. New York · 1994
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.