East River Savings Bank v. Kind
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtFrank A. GKtlotta, J.
These are three motions revolving about a claim to surplus moneys resulting from a foreclosure sale of property owned by a husband and wife as tenants by the entirety.(1) As a claimant in the foreclosure action, the wife moves to confirm the report of sale and for payment of one half of the surplus to her immediately without the appointment of a Referee in surplus money proceedings.(2) She also asks that the other one half of the surplus be impounded pending a decision on her motion in a separation action which has proceeded to judgment, wherein she seeks to punish the defendant for contempt…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Franklin Square National Bank v. SchillerNew York Supreme Court · 1950
- In re City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1937
- Stretz v. ZolkoskiNew York Supreme Court · 1922
3Cited by6 opinions
- College Point Savings Bank v. TomlinsonNew York Supreme Court · 1964
- Leis v. ShaughnessyNew York Supreme Court · 1960
- Mojeski v. SiegmannNew York Supreme Court · 1976
- Sasario v. CaloNew York Supreme Court · 1970
- South Shore Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. GundelNew York Supreme Court · 1963
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.