Legal Opinion
Doyle v. Hamm
New York Supreme Court
Decided August 18, 1975PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtVictor J. Orgera, J.
Plaintiff has moved to reargue a prior motion to confirm the Referee’s report in this partition action. The court did not confirm the report but referred it back to the Referee for modification.
In his report the Éeferee summarized the plaintiff’s testimony as follows:
"She married william r. hamm on September 23, 1954, and on November 2, 1962, as tenants by the entirety they purchased the real property which is the subject matter of this action. The property was purchased with the joint earnings of the plaintiff and defendant hamm subject to an existing mort*684gage held by the dime savings bank…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Hiles v. . FisherNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
- Bertles v. . NunanNew York Court of Appeals · 1883
- Stelz v. . ShreckNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
- In Re the Transfer Tax Upon the Estate of KlatzlNew York Court of Appeals · 1915
- Hosford v. HosfordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1948
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Community National Bank & Trust Co. of New York v. Persky (In Re Persky)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · 1987
- Doyle v. HammAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
- In Re FlinnUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. New York · 1988
- Bender v. BenderCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1981