Legal Opinion

Stretz v. Zolkoski

New York Supreme Court

Decided June 15, 1922PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Motion by purchaser on foreclosure for a setoff.

1Opinion of the CourtFawcett, J.

This is a motion to allow the defendant Mary Zolkoski, purchaser at the foreclosure sale in the above-entitled action, to set off as against the purchase price the equity in the said property, the title to which was held by her and her husband as tenants by the entirety. It is in effect an application for instructions to the referee after the sale. The facts substantially are as follows: The defendants Joseph Zolkoski and Mary Zolkoski, his wife, held title as tenants by the entirety and were the owners of the equity of redemption of the property in question at the time of the decree of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of BaumAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1907
  2. Heidelberger v. HeidelbergerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1921
  3. Germania Savings Bank v. JungNew York Supreme Court · 1892

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Hawthorne v. HawthorneNew York Court of Appeals · 1963
  2. Carlisle v. ParkerSuperior Court of Delaware · 1936
  3. Muskegon Lumber & Fuel Co. v. JohnsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1954
  4. College Point Savings Bank v. TomlinsonNew York Supreme Court · 1964
  5. East River Savings Bank v. KindNew York Supreme Court · 1960

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API