Legal Opinion
Mojeski v. Siegmann
New York Supreme Court
Decided July 30, 1976PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJohn F. Scileppi, J.
This is a motion by the defendants-claimants, Mid-Island Lumber & Supply Co., Inc., and Suffolk Cement Products, Inc., to confirm the referee’s report and to disburse the surplus money in accordance therewith. The motion is opposed by the defendant Doris C. Siegmann on grounds set forth below.
This is a surplus money proceeding following the foreclosure and sale of certain real property. The subject premises were owned by Doris Siegmann and Arthur Siegmann, her husband, as tenants by the entirety. The surplus money fund amounts to more than $18,000. The referee’s hearing was attended by a…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- In Re the Estate of BlumenthalNew York Court of Appeals · 1923
- Dunning v. . Ocean National BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
- Hawthorne v. HawthorneNew York Court of Appeals · 1963
- Franklin Square National Bank v. SchillerNew York Supreme Court · 1950
- Stretz v. ZolkoskiNew York Supreme Court · 1922
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. BrownAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
- National Bank & Trust Co. of Norwich v. RickardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
- Reif v. ReifOhio Court of Appeals · 1993
- McLaren v. McLarenNew York Family Court · 1979
- Mojeski v. SiegmannAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.