City of Pittsburgh v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge Wilkinson, Jr.,
As a result of the lengthy United Mine Workers strike which started on December 6, 1977 intervenor, *244Duquesne Light Company (Duquesne) sought by petition filed with the Public Utility Commission (Commission) on February 6, 1978 permission to file a tariff supplement, effective on one day’s notice, establishing an “emergency surcharge” in the amount of $.003 per kilowatt hour. Duquesne averred that the coal shortage resulting from the strike had forced it to make extraordinary purchases of power from other utilities to supplement a diminished generating capacity.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Pittsburgh v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
- Pittsburgh v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
- Pittsburgh v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
- Citizens Water Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
- Johnstown v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Barasch v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Green v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Western Pennsylvania Water Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- Popowsky v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
- Cohen v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.