Legal Opinion
Pittsburgh v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Decided July 24, 1952No. Appeal, No. 173PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam,
We shall make an order granting supersedeas in City of Pittsburgh v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission, No. 173, April Term, 1952. In view of the nature of the proceedings we shall give our reasons for making the following order.
The Pittsburgh Railways Company, on June 24, 1952, filed a new tariff of rates and fares for street car service, Rail Pa. P. U. C. No. P-24, to become effective July 27, 1952, and canceling Rail Pa. P. U. C. No. P-23, and all supplements thereto.1 Corresponding tariffs were filed for bus and incline service. On July 14,1952, the Commission, by a vote…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Commonwealth Ex Rel. Shumaker v. New York & Pennsylvania Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
- Coplay Cement Manufacturing Co. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
- Philadelphia v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
- Peoples Natural Gas Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
- Copley Cement Mfg. Co. v. PubLic Service CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
3Cited by24 opinions
- Wiley v. WoodsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
- Conestoga National Bank v. PattersonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
- In Re Kauai Electric Division of Citizens Utilities Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1978
- West Penn Power Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
- Baker v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.