Legal Opinion
Green v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided March 12, 1984No. Appeals, Nos. 2683 C.D. 1981, 1412 C.D. 1982 and 1422 C.D. 1982PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
President Judge Crumlish, Jr.,
We have consolidated for argument and disposition appeals of William J. Green and the City of Philadelphia. (City) and Walter W. Cohen, the Consumer Advocate of Pennsylvania (Consumer Advocate) from two orders of the Public Utility Commission (Commission) entered April 24, 1981 and May 21, 1982. The two orders allowed the Philadelphia Electric Company (PECO) annual rate increases of $185,-899,000 and $221,708,000, respectively. We affirm.1
No. 2683 C.D. 1981
The City appeals the Commission’s order allowing the inclusion in rate base of $185,899,000 for…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Commonwealth v. Pennsylvania Engineering Corp.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- Commonwealth v. StorySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Duquesne Light Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
- UGI Corp. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- Pike County Light & Power Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Barasch v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Keystone Coal Mining Corp. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
- Carol Lines, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Senior Citizens Coalition of Northeastern Minnesota v. Minnesota Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- Barasch v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.