Legal Opinion

Sunset Coatings Co. v. Department of Transportation

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 2, 1983No. A7912-05814; CA A20661PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGillette, P. J.

The state appeals from a judgment entered on a jury verdict in favor of plaintiff in this action for breach of contract. The central issue is whether the contract was ambiguous and therefore was correctly submitted to the jury for interpretation. We reverse.

Plaintiff and the Highway Division (Division) entered into a contract in January, 1979, that provided that plaintiff would sandblast and paint the Harrisburg Williamette River bridge for a bid price of $124,756. The contract provided specifications for the sandblasting and the painting. It required inspection by the Division of each phase…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Timberline Equipment Co., Inc. v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  2. A. H. Barbour & Son, Inc. v. State Highway CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Olson v. GAF Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1981

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Banister Continental Corp. v. Northwest Pipeline Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
  2. Oregon Rsa No. 6, Inc. v. Castle Rock Cellular of Oregon Ltd. PartnershipDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1993
  3. Hadley v. Extreme Technologies, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
  4. Banister Continental Corp. v. Northwest Pipeline Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API