A. H. Barbour & Son, Inc. v. State Highway Commission
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtLusk, J.
This is an action by a contractor to recover additional compensation from the State of Oregon acting by and through its State Highway Commission for work done under a contract for the maintenance cleaning and painting of all structural steel in the three steel spans below the roadway slab of the Yaquina Bay Bridge at Newport, Oregon.
In a trial before the court without a jury the court entered findings of fact and conclusions of law and a judgment in favor of the plaintiff in the sum of $37,468.96. Defendant has appealed from the judgment so far as it exceeds the sum of $2,968.96.
The contract…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United States v. SpearinSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Wood v. Fort WayneSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Sundstrom v. . State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1914
- Savage v. Peter Kiewit Sons' Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1967
- State Highway Commission v. Heintz Construction Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1967
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- McHorse v. Portland General Electric CompanyOregon Supreme Court · 1974
- Gillingham Construction Inc. v. Newby-Wiggins Construction Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2002
- Gilbert Pacific Corp. v. State ex rel. Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
- Washer v. Clatsop Care & Rehabilitation DistrictOregon Supreme Court · 1987
- Sunset Coatings Co. v. Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.