Legal Opinion

A. H. Barbour & Son, Inc. v. State Highway Commission

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided November 22, 1967PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLusk, J.

This is an action by a contractor to recover additional compensation from the State of Oregon acting by and through its State Highway Commission for work done under a contract for the maintenance cleaning and painting of all structural steel in the three steel spans below the roadway slab of the Yaquina Bay Bridge at Newport, Oregon.

In a trial before the court without a jury the court entered findings of fact and conclusions of law and a judgment in favor of the plaintiff in the sum of $37,468.96. Defendant has appealed from the judgment so far as it exceeds the sum of $2,968.96.

The contract…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United States v. SpearinSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
  2. Wood v. Fort WayneSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  3. Sundstrom v. . State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1914
  4. Savage v. Peter Kiewit Sons' Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1967
  5. State Highway Commission v. Heintz Construction Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1967

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. McHorse v. Portland General Electric CompanyOregon Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Gillingham Construction Inc. v. Newby-Wiggins Construction Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Gilbert Pacific Corp. v. State ex rel. Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
  4. Washer v. Clatsop Care & Rehabilitation DistrictOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Sunset Coatings Co. v. Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API