Legal Opinion
Banister Continental Corp. v. Northwest Pipeline Corp.
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided November 14, 1985No. 81-6-745; CA A28212Published
1Opinion of the Court
709 P.2d 1103 (1985)
BANISTER CONTINENTAL CORPORATION, Respondent-Cross-Appellant,
v.
NORTHWEST PIPELINE CORPORATION, Appellant-Cross-Respondent.
81-6-745; CA A28212.
Court of Appeals of Oregon, In Banc.
Argued and Submitted May 4, 1984.
Resubmitted February 6, 1985.
Decided November 14, 1985.
Reconsideration Denied January 10, 1986.
Elizabeth T. Dunning, Salt Lake City, Utah, and James H. Clarke, Portland, argued the cause for appellant cross-respondent. With them on the briefs were Watkiss & Campbell, Salt Lake City, Utah, and Corey, Byler & Rew, Pendleton, and Spears, Lubersky, Campbell, Bledsoe,…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Timberline Equipment Co., Inc. v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1978
- Public Market Co. v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1942
- Carlson v. BlumensteinOregon Supreme Court · 1982
- SCHOOL DIST. NO. 1, ETC. v. Mission Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
- Meskimen v. Larry Angell Salvage Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1979
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.