Legal Opinion

Banister Continental Corp. v. Northwest Pipeline Corp.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided November 14, 1985No. 81-6-745; CA A28212PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*284GILLETTE, J.

This is an action for damages for breach of two construction contracts. Defendant appeals from a judgment entered after a jury verdict in plaintiffs favor; plaintiff cross-appeals, seeking additional prejudgment interest. We affirm.

A detailed discussion of the facts is not required. In 1980, plaintiff and defendant entered into two contracts under which plaintiff would build 112 miles of natural gas pipeline for defendant in eastern Oregon. Work began in September 1980, and was completed in October 1981. Virtually every fact concerning that period is in dispute. It is sufficient…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Timberline Equipment Co., Inc. v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Public Market Co. v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Carlson v. BlumensteinOregon Supreme Court · 1982
  4. SCHOOL DIST. NO. 1, ETC. v. Mission Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
  5. Meskimen v. Larry Angell Salvage Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1979

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Strader v. Grange Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
  2. Hazelwood Water District v. First Union Management, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
  3. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. Tualatin Tire & Auto, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
  4. Quality Contractors, Inc. v. JacobsenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
  5. Stromme v. Nasburg and Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1986

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API