Legal Opinion
Oregon Rsa No. 6, Inc. v. Castle Rock Cellular of Oregon Ltd. Partnership
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided December 15, 1993No. CV 93-20-PAPublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PANNER, District Judge.
Plaintiff Oregon RSA No. 6, Inc. (“Oregon RSA”) brings this diversity action against defendants Castle Rock Cellular of Oregon Limited Partnership (“CRCO”), Cellular, Inc., Castle Rock Cellular, Inc. (“CRCI”), and Pacific Telecom Cellular, Inc. (“PTCI”) to resolve various disputes arising out of a limited partnership agreement. The parties each move for summary judgment on Count II. I grant plaintiffs motion, and deny defendants’ motions.
BACKGROUND
The Crook County RSA Limited Partnership (“Partnership” or “CCRLP”) was formed in May, 1989. The general partner was…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Migra v. Warren City School District Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- First National City Bank v. Banco Para El Comercio Exterior De CubaSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United Steelworkers of America v. Phelps Dodge Corporation, a New York Corporation, DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- Kham & Nate's Shoes No. 2, Inc., Debtor-Appellee v. First Bank of WhitingCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Shibata v. LimDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2000
- DirecTV Latin America, LLC v. PARK 610, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2010
- H-B-S Partnership v. Aircoa Hospitality Services, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2005
- Krauth v. Executive Telecard, Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 1995
- In Re SchickUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1999
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.