Legal Opinion

Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Wheeler

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided July 16, 2003No. A03A0663PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Adams, Judge.

The Uniform Commercial Code provides in part that a buyer who has accepted nonconforming goods can recover damages for *608breach of warranty if the buyer notifies the seller of defects in those goods within a reasonable time after discovery; otherwise it is barred from any remedy. OCGA § 11-2-607 (3) (a). Two years and three days after John P. Wheeler was injured by a device he purchased at Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., he served Wal-Mart with notice of a defect in the product. Wal-Mart sought summary judgment on the grounds that Wheeler waited an unreasonable time as a matter of law. The…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Hill v. Joseph T. Ryerson & Son, Inc.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Maybank v. S. S. Kresge Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  3. Fischer v. Mead Johnson LaboratoriesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1973
  4. Jones v. Cranman's Sporting GoodsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1977
  5. Warren's Kiddie Shoppe, Inc. v. Casual Slacks, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1969

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Mexia v. Rinker Boat Co., Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2009
  2. In re Rust-Oleum Restore Marketing, Sales Practices & Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2016
  3. Sloan v. Gen. Motors LLCDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2018
  4. Golden v. Den-Mat Corp.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 2012
  5. McCabe v. Daimler AGDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 2013

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API